Ninety-six

The Ninety-six is a zinc, copper, and lead mine located in Alaska.

About the MRDS Data:

All mine locations were obtained from the USGS Mineral Resources Data System. The locations and other information in this database have not been verified for accuracy. It should be assumed that all mines are on private property.

Mine Info

Name: Ninety-six

State:  Alaska

County:  na

Elevation:

Commodity: Zinc, Copper, Lead

Lat, Long: 56.04306, -130.06694

Map: View on Google Maps

Satelite View

MRDS mine locations are often very general, and in some cases are incorrect. Some mine remains have been covered or removed by modern industrial activity or by development of things like housing. The satellite view offers a quick glimpse as to whether the MRDS location corresponds to visible mine remains.


Satelite image of the Ninety-six

Ninety-six MRDS details

Site Name

Primary: Ninety-six
Secondary: Gold Eagle


Commodity

Primary: Zinc
Primary: Copper
Primary: Lead


Location

State: Alaska
District: Hyder


Land Status

Not available


Holdings

Not available


Workings

Not available


Ownership

Not available


Production

Not available


Deposit

Record Type: Site
Operation Category: Prospect
Operation Type: Unknown
Years of Production:
Organization:
Significant:


Physiography

Not available


Mineral Deposit Model

Model Name: Polymetallic veins


Orebody

Not available


Structure

Not available


Alterations

Alteration Type: L
Alteration Text: Hostrock identified as quartzite may indicate silicification of pelitic country rock.


Rocks

Not available


Analytical Data

Not available


Materials

Ore: Chalcopyrite
Ore: Galena
Ore: Sphalerite
Ore: Tetrahedrite
Gangue: Quartz


Comments

Comment (Geology): Age = Maas and others (1995, p. 254) suggest that the age of the Ninety-six (96) prospect is Eocene, based on similarities in mineralogy, structural setting, and hostrock, to isotope-dated Eocene deposits in the Hyder district (see, for example, BC086). If so, the deposit is contemporaneous with emplacement of the Boundary Granodiorite.

Comment (Deposit): Model Name = Polymetallic veins

Comment (Reference): Primary Reference = Cobb, 1978 (OFR 78-922)

Comment (Workings): Workings / Exploration = Deposit was explored in the 1920's by opencuts and a 100-foot adit that was driven to intersect the lode.

Comment (Deposit): Other Comments = Probably originally staked in early 1920's.? In an early report, Buddington (1925, p. 87) includes a reference to Snyder, presumably the claimholder at the time. The Gold Eagle claims, staked in 1955, probably covered the Ninety-six property (U.S. Bureau of Mines, 1979).

Comment (Production): Production Notes = Reported small test shipment of hand-cobbed ore (Maas and others, 1995, p. 258).

Comment (Geology): Geologic Description = The country rocks in the area of this prospect are the Triassic Texas Creek Granodiorite, which underlies and locally intrudes pelitic metasedimentary and subordinate andesitic metavolcanic strata of the Jurassic or older Mesozoic Hazelton Group; the Eocene Boundary Granodiorite, which intrudes the Hazelton and Texas Creek rocks; and still-younger Tertiary lamprophyre dikes, which cut all the other rocks (Smith, 1973, 1977; Koch, 1996).? the deposit (Buddington, 1925, p. 87, and 1929, p. 93; summarized by Cobb, 1978, p. 61) is in a breccia zone in a Texas Creek granodiorite dike in interbedded slate and quartzite. The breccia zone is about 5 feet thick and was traced in outcrop for about 200 feet. The zone consists of reticulating quartz stringers and veinlets that aggregate 12-14 inches in thickness that contain galena, sphalerite, a little chalcopyrite, and sparse tetrahedrite. A 63-foot adit was driven to intersect the lode, but there is no record of any production.? Maas and others (1995, p. 254) suggest that the age of the Ninety-six (96) prospect is Eocene, based on similarities in mineralogy, structural setting, and hostrock, to isotope-dated Eocene deposits in the Hyder district (see, for example, BC086). If so, the deposit is contemporaneous with emplacement of the Boundary Granodiorite.


References

Reference (Deposit): Maas, K.M., Bittenbender, P E., and Still, J.C., 1995, Mineral investigations in the Ketchikan mining district, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 11-95, 606 p.

Reference (Deposit): U.S. Bureau of Mines, 1979, Claim map 118: Mines and prospects of the Bradfield Canal quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 20-73, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000.

Reference (Deposit): Koch, R.D., 1996, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Bradfield Canal quadrangle, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-728-A, 35 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000.

Reference (Deposit): Elliott, R.L., and Koch, R.D., 1981, Mines, prospects, and selected metalliferous mineral occurrences in the Bradfield Canal quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-728-B, 23 p., 1 sheet, scales 1:250,000 and 1:63,360.

Reference (Deposit): Smith, J.G., 1977, Geology of the Ketchikan D-1 and Bradfield Canal A-1 quadrangles, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1425, 49 p.

Reference (Deposit): Cobb, E.H., 1978, Summary of references to mineral occurrences (other than mineral fuels and construction materials) in the Bradfield Canal quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-922, 98 p.

Reference (Deposit): Smith, J.G., 1973, A Tertiary lamprophyre dike province in southeastern Alaska: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 10, p. 408-420.

Reference (Deposit): Buddington, A.F., 1925, Mineral investigations in southeastern Alasaka: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 773, p. 71-139.

Reference (Deposit): Buddington, A.F., 1929, Geology of Hyder and vicinity, southeastern Alaska, with a reconnaissance of Chickamin River: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 807, 124 p.


The Top Ten Gold Producing States

The Top Ten Gold Producing States

These ten states contributed the most to the gold production that built the West from 1848 through the 1930s. The Top Ten Gold Producing States.