The Sandstorm Mine is a gold mine located in Esmeralda county, Nevada at an elevation of 5,600 feet.
About the MRDS Data:
All mine locations were obtained from the USGS Mineral Resources Data System. The locations and other information in this database have not been verified for accuracy. It should be assumed that all mines are on private property.
Mine Info
Elevation: 5,600 Feet (1,707 Meters)
Commodity: Gold
Lat, Long: 37.73917, -117.22472
Map: View on Google Maps
Mine Description
The Kendall claim adjoins the Sandstorm on the north and, with the Argosy and Oregon claims, is the property of the Goldfield Kendall Mining Company. The principal workings are on the Kendall claim and on the same ledge as those of the Sandstorm. The mine was first worked by lessees, but was being operated by the company in 1905. The total production to the end of that year was about $100,000. Little work has been done on the Kendall of late years, and the following description applies to the mine as it was in 1905.
The main shaft of the Kendall mine is vertical, and at the end of 1905 was about 200 feet deep, with levels at 60 and 100 feet. Sinking was then in progress. Above the 60-foot level are some small tunnels and some irregular stopes and drifts. All the stoping at the time of visit had been done between the 60-foot level and the surface.
The Kendall shaft is sunk in Sandstorm rhyolite, which, as shown in Plate II, here forms a narrow strip between an area of Kendall tuff on the west and the Milltown andesite on the east. At a depth of about 135 feet the shaft passed into this tuff and continued in it for about 20 feet. It then passed into rhyolite of the intrusive Morena type, and continued in this rock to the bottom. The exact thickness of the tuff where it is penetrated by the shaft is not measurable, as the lagging of the shaft conceals the contacts. The general relation of these rocks is shown in section in figure 29 (see figure in gallery).
The tuff, as exposed at the surface, appears to pass beneath the Sandstorm rhyolite on the north, west, and south, but to be cut off on the east by a fault. (See PI. II.) This fault is well exposed on the 60-foot level, about 27 feet west of the shaft. There is not much brecciation of either rock, but the plane of movement is marked by a distinct gouge. The fault plane at this place dips about 40° E. It truncates the flow banding of the rhyolite, which dips about 25° W. The tuff probably rests upon Morena rhyolite about 150 feet below the surface. This rhyolite is doubtless intrusive into the tuff, but the contact has not been exposed except in the shaft.
On the 100-foot level a crosscut has been driven east through the Sandstorm rhyolite into the andesite, as shown in figure 29. The contact lies about 135 feet east of the shaft on this level, and appears to be the result of faulting. The andesite is soft and altered and is either tuffaceous or has been brecciated by movement. The faulting is probably local and is thought to represent minor displacement along a contact which originally was a rhyolitic surface over which the andesite flowed.
This same plane of movement, which dips about 35° E., is exposed in a tunnel just north of the main Kendall shaft. Near the mouth of this tunnel a shaft goes down through about 95 feet of andesite to the same contact. This shaft was not in good condition in 1905, but the dump indicated the presence of soft gouge like material at the base of the andesite and showed considerable pyritization of this rock in its lower part.
The Kendall ledge is the same as that of the Sandstorm mine. It is an indefinitely bounded zone of silicification in the effusive rhyolite. It was doubtful at the time of visit whether the ledge could be recognized at all below the point where the shaft enters tuff. The rhyolite in the bottom of the shaft contained much alunite, but this kind of alteration is so widespread in the Morena rhyolite as to be practically useless as a means of distinguishing typical ledge matter from country rock.
At the time of visit, near the end of 1905, no ore had been found below the 60-foot level.
Considerable rich ore was found by lessees at the surface, pockets of soft auriferous material having been gouged out from the hard, low-grade, siliceous part of the croppings. Subsequently ore was found, much as in the Sandstorm, in the form of small irregular bunches very erratically distributed through the ledge. The dependence of these rich bunches, however, upon transverse fissures was clearly shown, these fissures, which are neither regular nor persistent, having generally northwest-southeast trends.
The ore is entirely oxidized and no sulphide ore has yet been discovered beneath it. It is usually a soft mixture of kaolinite, quartz, limonite, and native gold, with abundant barite in crystals up to an inch or more in length. As in the Sandstorm mine, the barite crystals are usually implanted on silicified rhyolite with their free ends embedded in kaolinite or kaolinitic ore. No alunite has been noted in the Kendall ore, although this mineral is abundant in the bottom of the shaft.
Source: The Geology and Ore Deposits of Goldfield Nevada. USGS professional paper 66, 1906
Sandstorm Mine MRDS details
Site Name
                            
                            Primary: Sandstorm Mine
                        
                    
                            Secondary: Sandstorm, Kruger, Stimler Fraction, Argosy, Kendall, Magnolia,
                        
                    
                            Secondary: Oregon Claims
                        
                    
                            Secondary: Sandstorm-Kendall Consolidated Mining Co. Property
                        
                
Commodity
                                        
                Primary: Gold
                
                            
                Secondary: Silver
                
                            
                Tertiary: Copper
                
                            
                Tertiary: Bismuth
                
                        
Location
                                                State: Nevada 
                                                County: Esmeralda 
                                                District: Goldfield District 
                    
Land Status
                                                Land ownership: Private
                        Note: the land ownership field only identifies whether the area the mine is in is generally on public lands like Forest Service or BLM land, or if it is in an area that is generally private property. It does not definitively identify property status, nor does it indicate claim status or whether an area is open to prospecting. Always respect private property.
                        
                                
Holdings
Not available
Workings
                        Type: Underground
        
Ownership
                Owner Name: Nevada Gold Co., President, Leonard Phillips,  Reactivated The Co.
                Years: 1981 - 
Production
Not available
Deposit
                            Record Type: Site
                Operation Category: Past Producer
                Operation Type: Unknown
                Year First Production: 1904
                Discovery Year: 1902
                Years of Production: 
                Organization: 
                Significant: N
                Deposit Size: S
           
        
Physiography
Not available
Mineral Deposit Model
Not available
Orebody
                                                                            Form: TABULAR TO IRREGULAR
                                    
Structure
 
                    Type: L
                   Description: Faults
            
Alterations
                    Alteration Type: L
                    Alteration Text: Silicification, Kaolinization, Alunitization, Pyritization
            
Rocks
    
                    Name: Dacite
                    Role: Host
                    Age Type: Associated Rock Unit
                    Age in Years: 21.250000+-0.750000
                    Dating Method: K-Ar
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Dacite
                    Role: Host
                    Age Type: Host Rock
                    Age in Years: 21.500000+-
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Rhyolite
                    Role: Host
                    Age Type: Associated Rock Unit
                    Age in Years: 21.250000+-0.750000
                    Dating Method: K-Ar
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Rhyolite
                    Role: Host
                    Age Type: Host Rock
                    Age in Years: 21.500000+-
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Tuff
                    Role: Host
                    Age Type: Host Rock
                    Age in Years: 21.500000+-
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Tuff
                    Role: Host
                    Age Type: Associated Rock Unit
                    Age in Years: 21.250000+-0.750000
                    Dating Method: K-Ar
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Dacite
                    Role: Associated
                    Age Type: Host Rock
                    Age in Years: 21.500000+-
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Dacite
                    Role: Associated
                    Age Type: Associated Rock Unit
                    Age in Years: 21.250000+-0.750000
                    Dating Method: K-Ar
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Rhyolite
                    Role: Associated
                    Age Type: Associated Rock Unit
                    Age in Years: 21.250000+-0.750000
                    Dating Method: K-Ar
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Rhyolite
                    Role: Associated
                    Age Type: Host Rock
                    Age in Years: 21.500000+-
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Tuff
                    Role: Associated
                    Age Type: Associated Rock Unit
                    Age in Years: 21.250000+-0.750000
                    Dating Method: K-Ar
                    Age Young: Miocene
    
                    Name: Tuff
                    Role: Associated
                    Age Type: Host Rock
                    Age in Years: 21.500000+-
                    Age Young: Miocene
Analytical Data
Not available
Materials
                                       
                    Ore: Chalcopyrite 
                           
                    Gangue: Limonite 
                           
                    Gangue: Kaolinite 
                           
                    Gangue: Quartz 
                           
                    Gangue: Pyrite 
                           
                    Gangue: Barite 
                           
                    Gangue: Alunite 
                        
Comments
Comment (Deposit): SANDSTORM-KENDALL LEDGE IS A ZONE OF STRONGLY SILICIFIED RHYOLITE WITH PAY SHOOTS IN IRREGULAR MASSES OF SOFTER KAOLINITIC AND LIMONITIC MATERIAL. SOME IRREGULAR PIPES AND CHIMNEYS IN SILICIFIED ZONES
Comment (Workings): 130-FT SANDSTORM SHAFT INCLINED 68 DEGREES E IN 1905, WITH CROSSCUT AT 138 FT, STOPES ABOVE 50-FT. LEVEL. IN 1908, MAIN SHAFT WAS 400 FT DEEP. KENDALL SHAFT WAS 200 FT DEEP IN 1905 WITH LEVELS AT 60 AND 100 FT. MAIN SHAFT 500 FT DEEP BY 1922, WITH WINZE TO 700 FT.
Comment (Location): OFF NW END OF MORENA RIDGE; 70 ACRES. UTM IS TO ONE SHAFT ON THE PROPERTY.. UTM IS TO ONE SHAFT ON THE SANDSTORM PROPERTY. ; INFO FROM LAND.ST :(1972)
Comment (Production): SOME EARLY ORE WAS AS RICH AS $4600/TON. PRODUCTION WAS MAINLY BY LESSEES. SOME RICH ORE CONTAINED 230 OZ/TON AU
Comment (Development): CLAIMS WERE LOCATED 1902-1903. SANDSTORM AND KENDALL GOLD MINING CO'S. INC WERE INCORPORATED IN 1904. SMALL SHIPMENTS OF GOLD ORE WERE BEING MADE FROM THE SANDSTORM & KENDALL BY LATE 1904. THE TWO COMPANIES MERGED IN 1909, EACH HAVING PRODUCED OVER $400,000 IN ORE, MAINLY BY LESSEES
References
                
                                        Reference (Deposit): SHAMBERGER, H.A., 1982, THE STORY OF GOLDFIELD; NEVADA HISTORICAL PRESS, CARSON CITY, NEVADA, 240 P. 
                                                                
            
                
                                        Reference (Deposit): NBMG REPORT 33, P. 77-86 
                                                                
            
                
                                        Reference (Deposit): NBMG REPORT 19, P. 64-65. 
                                                                
            
                
                                        Reference (Deposit): THE MINING RECORD NEWSPAPER, FEB. 18, 1981 
                                                                
            
                
                                        Reference (Deposit): WEED, W.H., ED., 1922, THE MINES HANDBOOK, VOL. XV, P. 1325. 
                                                                
            
                
                                        Reference (Deposit): RANSOME, F.L., 1909, USGS P.P. 66, P. 235-236. 
                                                                
            
                
                                        Reference (Production): SHAMBERGER, H.A., 1982, P. 193, 199. 
                                                                
            
Nevada Gold
 
Nevada has a total of 368 distinct gold districts. Of the of those, just 36 are major producers with production and/or reserves of over 1,000,000 ounces, 49 have production and/or reserves of over 100,000 ounces, with the rest having less than 100,000 ounces. Read more: Gold Districts of Nevada.