Boston No. 2 Claim

The Boston No. 2 Claim is a gold and silver mine located in Juab county, Utah at an elevation of 7,283 feet.

About the MRDS Data:

All mine locations were obtained from the USGS Mineral Resources Data System. The locations and other information in this database have not been verified for accuracy. It should be assumed that all mines are on private property.

Mine Info

Name: Boston No. 2 Claim

State:  Utah

County:  Juab

Elevation: 7,283 Feet (2,220 Meters)

Commodity: Gold, Silver

Lat, Long: 39.81361, -114.02389

Map: View on Google Maps

Satelite View

MRDS mine locations are often very general, and in some cases are incorrect. Some mine remains have been covered or removed by modern industrial activity or by development of things like housing. The satellite view offers a quick glimpse as to whether the MRDS location corresponds to visible mine remains.


Satelite image of the Boston No. 2 Claim

Boston No. 2 Claim MRDS details

Site Name

Primary: Boston No. 2 Claim


Commodity

Primary: Gold
Primary: Silver
Secondary: Copper
Secondary: Lead
Secondary: Zinc


Location

State: Utah
County: Juab
District: Spring Creek District


Land Status

Not available


Holdings

Not available


Workings

Not available


Ownership

Not available


Production

Not available


Deposit

Record Type: Site
Operation Category: Occurrence
Operation Type: Unknown
Discovery Method: Ore-Mineral In Place
Years of Production:
Organization:
Significant: N
Deposit Size: S


Physiography

Not available


Mineral Deposit Model

Not available


Orebody

Form: LINEAR, POD


Structure

Type: R
Description: Reverse And Normal Faulting Including Thrust Faulting


Alterations

Alteration Type: L
Alteration Text: Argentojarosite. Ag In Limestone, Chert Laminae, And In Limonitic Material.


Rocks

Name: Limestone
Role: Host
Age Type: Host Rock
Age Young: Late Cambrian


Analytical Data

Analytical Data: SATKOSKI AND SOKASKI REPORT ROCK SAMPLES FROM BOSTON NO. 2 CLAIM: #18, #19, FROM A SMALL PIT (THEIR FIG. 4, 5) WHERE ARGENTOJAROSITE MATERIAL IS EXPOSED: #18, A 10 IN CHIP FROM AN IRREGULAR LIMONITE SEAM IN LIMESTONE, .04 OZ/TON AU, 71.6 OZ/TON AG, 19 PERCENT CU
Analytical Data: #19 SELECTED LIMONITE FROM #18, .02 OZ/TON AU, 141.2 OZ/TON AG, .39 PERCENT CU. METAL CONTENTS OF 7 CHIP SAMPLES ACROSS A LIMESTONE BED WITH CHERT LAMINAE FROM THIS SAME PIT: 6 SAMPLES RANGED FROM 2.7 TO 14 PPM AG, THE 7TH SHOWED 230 PPM AG, 150 PPM CU, 1200 PPM PB, 760 PPM ZN. SAMPLES #20-22 FROM NORTH END OF AN ELONGATE PIT (THEIR FIG. 4, 6): #20, 30 IN CHIP THROUGH IRREGULAR LIMONITE ZONE, TR. AU, 16.9 OZ/TON AG, .14 PERCENT CU, .48 PERCENT PB. #21, SELECTED LIMONITE FROM #20, 20.6 OZ/TON AG, .57 PERCENT CU, 2.9 PERCENT PB. OTHER SAMPLES (#22 AND #23, 24) CONTAINED LESS AG, TWO CONTAINED ROUGHLY 4 PERCENT MN.


Materials

Gangue: Limestone
Gangue: Chert


Comments

Comment (Development): SAMPLING (SATKOSKI AND SOKASKI, 1980). NEARLY ALL SURFACE EXPOSURES OF BRECCIATED, SILICIFIED AND LIMONITIC ZONES HAVE RECEIVED SOME EXPLORATORY ATTENTION.

Comment (Deposit): MOST BRECCIATED, SILICIFIED, AND LIMONITIC ZONES ARE WEAKLY MINERALIZED. SOME, HOWEVER, ARE HIGHLY MINERALIZED CONTAINING UP TO 141. OZ/TON AG (SAMPLE 19 OF SATKOSKI AND SOKASKI). MINERALIZED ZONES INVARIABLY HAVE SMALL LATERAL EXTENT.

Comment (Workings): SMALL PITS AND CUTS, ONE ADIT.

Comment (Location): PREVIOUS QUAD DESIGNATION = GRAND JUNCTION 1:250000

Comment (Geology): HOST ROCKS DO NOT APPEAR GREATLY DEFORMED, HOWEVER, THEY HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO SEVERAL PERIODS OF FOLDING, REVERSE AND NORMAL FAULTING, AND UPLIFT. IN GENERAL THEY ARE PART OF THE SNAKE RANGE DECOLLEMENT THRUST WITH PRINCIPAL MOVEMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST.

Comment (Deposit): JOHNSON CANYON HAS FEW EXPOSURES OF SILVER-BEARING ROCK, BUT MAJOR SUBSURFACE MINERALIZED STRUCTURES MAY BE PRESENT. HIGH SILVER CONTENT IN THE MINERALIZED ROCKS ON AND NEAR THE PATENTED CLAIMS IS COMMONLY RELATED TO BRECCIATION AND SILICIFICATION ALONG NORTH-TRENDING FAULTS. OTHER AG LOCALES ARE IN SILICIOUS LIMONITE ALONG BEDDING PLANES AND CROSS FAULTS, OR IN SMALL PODS, BUT MAJOR SUBSURFACE MINERALIZED STRUCTURES MAY BE PRESENT. NOTE: EVENING NO. 1 MINE AND EVENING NO. 2 MINE ARE ON THIS PATENTED CLAIM. ; INFO.SRC : 1 PUB LIT


References

Reference (Deposit): SATKOSKI, JACK J., AND SOKASKI, MICHAEL, 1980, FIELD INVENTORY OF MINERAL RESOURCES, GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION, NEVADA AND UTAH: REPORT BIA NO. 13-11, P. 16-31, FIG. 3-7, PLATES 4,14,16, APPENDIX 10,11


The Top Ten Gold Producing States

The Top Ten Gold Producing States

These ten states contributed the most to the gold production that built the West from 1848 through the 1930s. The Top Ten Gold Producing States.